draggonlaady: (Default)
draggonlaady ([personal profile] draggonlaady) wrote2010-10-07 02:07 pm

Snyder v Phelps

Supreme court has heard testimony. Apparently no actual in-court insanity from any of the Phelps', but they felt it necessary to picket their own trial, whatever that's supposed to prove.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_pl3827

http://blogs.pitch.com/plog/2010/10/fred_phelps_daughters_sing_crazy_train.php

Pretty heavy-handed bias in the second article there... way to uphold journalistic objectivity! Not that I disagree, I mean the Phelps'/WBC are nutjobs extraordinaire, but I make no pretense of objectivity here.

Be interesting to see what the judges come back with, though one article said they don't expect a final decision for several months.

[identity profile] sistawendy.livejournal.com 2010-10-08 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, this is one of those cases where the law may not have caught up with morality.

But since a) this is a civil case and it's therefore only money, and b) they were protesting a funeral, for crying out loud, not a government office, I say sock it to Phelps.