draggonlaady (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
draggonlaady) wrote2007-05-07 06:30 pm
draggonlaady) wrote2007-05-07 06:30 pm
Entry tags:
Ok, really...
What, exactly, is this supposed to prove?
Playboy’s Holly Madison: ‘I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur’
Playboy model and The Girls Next Door star Holly Madison may wear bunny ears, but she’ll never wear bunny fur—and she posed naked in PETA’s latest “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” ad to prove it!
I'm missing the part that's significant about someone who poses naked for a living posing naked for an advert.
Playboy’s Holly Madison: ‘I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur’
Playboy model and The Girls Next Door star Holly Madison may wear bunny ears, but she’ll never wear bunny fur—and she posed naked in PETA’s latest “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” ad to prove it!
I'm missing the part that's significant about someone who poses naked for a living posing naked for an advert.
no subject
I'll forego my gut comment and give the official line on this:
A naked woman, who is a Playboy Playmate, automatically accomplishes their frist goal; raising awareness. This is the easier route. They know men are going to look at the ad this time rather than just see PETA and turn the page. Sure it may only make a difference to 1 in a million but the overall awareness of the issues gets raised.
no subject
Ok, i can see that logic.