![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
draggonlaadySo there's a woman suing Homeagain because her cat got a tumor.
I'd like to point out that there are a couple very important details not provided in this article, which I immediately want to know. 1: Did the cat receive leukemia vaccinations? If yes, were they given in the area of the tumor? Because, unlike microchips, there is a known relationship between sarcoma formation and leukemia vaccination sites. 2: What does the biopsy of the tumor show? (and there BETTER have been a biopsy, or why the hell are they even in court?) Because if this is a mast cell tumor or melanoma instead of a sarcoma, then just no.
Previous discussion, same topic: http://draggonlaady.livejournal.com/163158.html
I'd like to point out that there are a couple very important details not provided in this article, which I immediately want to know. 1: Did the cat receive leukemia vaccinations? If yes, were they given in the area of the tumor? Because, unlike microchips, there is a known relationship between sarcoma formation and leukemia vaccination sites. 2: What does the biopsy of the tumor show? (and there BETTER have been a biopsy, or why the hell are they even in court?) Because if this is a mast cell tumor or melanoma instead of a sarcoma, then just no.
Previous discussion, same topic: http://draggonlaady.livejournal.com/163158.html
