"Organic" vs "Conventional" food
Jul. 29th, 2009 03:51 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, my standard statement: the term "organic" food pisses me off. By the very definition of the word, everything you eat had better be organic or you won't process it, you carbon-burner, you.
Anyway, study reported by the BBC found no significant differences in nutritional value between food crops raised using pesticides/fertilizers/etc and "organic" crops. This study did not, mind you, address potential differences in ecological impact between methods.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8174482.stm
Anyway, study reported by the BBC found no significant differences in nutritional value between food crops raised using pesticides/fertilizers/etc and "organic" crops. This study did not, mind you, address potential differences in ecological impact between methods.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8174482.stm
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 02:22 pm (UTC)Don't get me started on recycling. It just makes me cranky. My township finally "got" recycling, but the list is short and it means that a lot of plastic still gets tossed (and that's even of the recyclable stuff). I can't even haul it anywhere myself- nowhere in the area will take #5 plastic (which seems to be the most common food container plastic).
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 02:35 pm (UTC)'Round here, the closest place that takes any plastic but milk jugs is 45 miles away. The take 1 and 2, but only if it has a neck smaller than the body, so the open yogurt buckets, coffee cans, etc still aren't accepted.