draggonlaady: (Vampire Cat)
And another article, focusing on the mentality behind the widespread rejection of all the scientific evidence pointing away from vaccination as a cause of autism.

"A Broken Trust" by Liza Gross; Senior Science Writer/Editor, PLoS Biology, Public Library of Science, San Francisco, California, United States of America

http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1000114
draggonlaady: (Default)
I'm way behind on my reading, as usual. This article is from Newsweek, published in February 2009. It's a fairly decent explanation of the whole MMR/thimerosal/autism thing. Some key points:

1: MMR (Measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine does NOT contain thimerosol
2: Thimerosal does contain mercury, and had been used in vaccines since the 1930's. The U.S. Public Health Service made a statement urging a change in preservative because even though there are "no data or evidence of any harm" from thimerosal, children's cumulative exposure to mercury from vaccines "exceeds one of the federal safety guidelines" for mercury. This is mostly because the number of vaccines recommended has increased steadily as new vaccines are developed and approved.
3: The initial study claiming to find a connection between MMR and autism had nothing to do with thimerosal; there are 2 separate issues that people keep mashing into one. (NEITHER of which has been shown in further study to have a correlation with autism.)
4: The initial MMR/autism study included only 12 children.
5: In 2002, a Royal Free (UK) study of 473 children had found no difference in the rates of autism between those who had received the MMR and those who had not. Scientists in Finland, studying 2 million children, reached the same conclusion in a 2000 paper. So did scientists at Boston University, studying the medical records of 3 million children, in 2001. In 2004 a study of the medical records of 14,000 children in Britain found that the more thimerosal the children had been exposed to through vaccines, the less likely they were to have neurological problems.
draggonlaady: (Default)
with the researchers,who agree with the immunologists, who agree with the pediatricians that vaccines are good for kids, and do not cause autism.

This is good.

It is, apparently, not enough for the fine folks at the National Vaccine Information Center.

Barbara Loe Fisher, the center's president, said the court's ruling will do little to change the minds of most parents who suspect a link between vaccines and autism. She said more studies are needed. "I think it is a mistake to conclude that, because these few test cases were denied compensation, it's been decided vaccines don't play any role in regressive autism."

While that statement is probably true when taken by itself and out of context (ie, a judge denying payment on a suit does not prove or disprove a scientific effect), I find it grotesquely laughable that this woman is calling for more studies, when already there have been at least dozens (possibly hundreds?) of studies showing no link between vaccination and autism, only one study ever that did, and at least 2 studies that specifically debunked that one.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation/story/900721.html

Profile

draggonlaady: (Default)
draggonlaady

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 12131415
1617181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 10:18 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios