![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Check this out for more details, but apparently the administration has decided that even religious non-profit employers will be required to provide coverage of contraceptives in their employee insurance benes. They get longer than anyone else to make that happen, of course, because religion is still a privileged category somehow (whatwhat? separation of church and state? what's that?) but no more "here, you can have insurance, but you can't get THAT done" exclusions.
Ever wonder
Dec. 1st, 2009 06:33 pmwhy the veterinarian doesn't want you to hold your own animal during procedures? Here's why:
Dr Y was presented a cat for dyspnea. A staff member attempted to place an oxygen mask on the cat while the owner held the pet. On the first attempt, the cat bit the oxygen tubing. On the second attempt, the cat bit the owner.A technician administered first aid to the ownre and then placed the cat in an oxygen chamber. Dr Y continued with treatment. The next day, the owner sought medical treatment and was given a tetanus shot and antibiotics. The owner experienced severe swelling and was hospitalized for five days to treat cellulitis caused by the cat bite. After leaving the hospital, the owner received physical therapy. The owner hired an attorney and demanded $85,000 alleging that Dr Y and the practice staff were negligent. Dr Y's insurance carrier determined that it was below the standard of care to have the owner restrain the cat during treatment, and Dr Y consented to settle the case. After several offers and counter-offers, the case settled and Dr Y's insurance carrier reimbursed the owner $20,000 for medical expenses related to the cat bite.
Please note, this is not anybody that I know. It was a reminder sent out by my insurance carrier. Though it could very easily be anybody--owners are VERY insistent on holding their own pets, and especially if you're short handed its very tempting to let them instead of waiting for an assistant to be free.
Dr Y was presented a cat for dyspnea. A staff member attempted to place an oxygen mask on the cat while the owner held the pet. On the first attempt, the cat bit the oxygen tubing. On the second attempt, the cat bit the owner.A technician administered first aid to the ownre and then placed the cat in an oxygen chamber. Dr Y continued with treatment. The next day, the owner sought medical treatment and was given a tetanus shot and antibiotics. The owner experienced severe swelling and was hospitalized for five days to treat cellulitis caused by the cat bite. After leaving the hospital, the owner received physical therapy. The owner hired an attorney and demanded $85,000 alleging that Dr Y and the practice staff were negligent. Dr Y's insurance carrier determined that it was below the standard of care to have the owner restrain the cat during treatment, and Dr Y consented to settle the case. After several offers and counter-offers, the case settled and Dr Y's insurance carrier reimbursed the owner $20,000 for medical expenses related to the cat bite.
Please note, this is not anybody that I know. It was a reminder sent out by my insurance carrier. Though it could very easily be anybody--owners are VERY insistent on holding their own pets, and especially if you're short handed its very tempting to let them instead of waiting for an assistant to be free.
