draggonlaady: (Default)
[personal profile] draggonlaady
The whole homeopathic thing. I don't GET how people think about this stuff. I mean, I totally get that some plants have components with medicinal effect. Hell, something like 2/3 - 3/4 of our drugs are based on plants, so that's a given. What I don't understand though, is why so many people seem to be convinced that medicines that have been developed and tested and standardized so that we know what they do, and why, and exactly how much is in each tablet/capsule/milliliter should be shunned in favor of something that's never been tested, or is given in such diluted tiny doses that even if there IS medicinal effect from the plant it can't possibly be a therapeutic dose; why so many people buy into the "it's natural so it's totally safe" thing. I mean, really--ricin is totally natural, all organic, and deadly as bullets. Why are standardized, regulated medicinal components regarded as less desirable than herbal concoctions from the supplement store downtown? Do people not realize that different parts of the plant have different compositions? That maturity of plant at harvest, and handling, and time since harvest, and the soil it was grown in all affect the composition? That there is NO WAY TO KNOW how much of what is in that powdered stuff without sending it to a lab for analysis? How is that an improvement?

You cannot have things both ways; either the substance has medicinal effect, and therefore there have to be safe and effective dose limits (too little = not effective, too much = toxic) or it's completely safe at any and all doses, and is almost as effective as distilled water.
And it's not just random crazies that come up with these things. A veterinarian on a listserve I subscribe to recently asked for dose recommendations for a homeopathic treatment. Okay, fine.. until the response she got which was "how much you give does not matter, just give it for 3 - 5 days." This from a frelling doctor! How on Earth can it not matter how much you give?! I replied asking (as politely as possible) how dose cannot matter. No replies yet.

Sept dc = 33

Date: 2009-10-10 03:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] draggonlaady.livejournal.com
As best I can gather, the theory is very similar to desensitization shots for allergies. But in desensitization, dose is EVERYTHING. If you get it too low, you get no response. If you get it too high, you risk anaphalactic shock. So that STILL doesn't explain the "dose doesn't matter" comment. The doctor has not replied with an explanation.

Profile

draggonlaady: (Default)
draggonlaady

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 12131415
1617181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 02:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios