"Organic" vs "Conventional" food
Jul. 29th, 2009 03:51 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, my standard statement: the term "organic" food pisses me off. By the very definition of the word, everything you eat had better be organic or you won't process it, you carbon-burner, you.
Anyway, study reported by the BBC found no significant differences in nutritional value between food crops raised using pesticides/fertilizers/etc and "organic" crops. This study did not, mind you, address potential differences in ecological impact between methods.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8174482.stm
Anyway, study reported by the BBC found no significant differences in nutritional value between food crops raised using pesticides/fertilizers/etc and "organic" crops. This study did not, mind you, address potential differences in ecological impact between methods.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8174482.stm
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 07:15 am (UTC)More ecologically sound, entirely likely, and certainly lower in residuals that make us sick (cf hormones fed to cows found in milk fed to little girls who grow up to have endometriosis)
But -nutritional value-??
Tangent- I think you'd like a trend in the UK to label everything a) what variety or breed it is and b) what county, and sometimes even what far it comes from. That's cool, and helps raise awareness w/o going all yuppie locavore about it.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 02:19 pm (UTC)There are lots of problems with just assuming organic is better for the environment too... shipping distance and type of management and type of hauler make a huge difference; something that comes from a tractor-plowed field 3 miles away and gets hauled in in the old beater flat-bed 1 ton with no muffler is going to do a good bit more environmental damage than something raised in a greenhouse and shipped by van from 50 miles away, for example.
I've always been bemused to see things like the yogurt in Trader Joe's: all organic, better for you and for the environment! Sold in non-recyclable plastic cups.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 02:22 pm (UTC)Don't get me started on recycling. It just makes me cranky. My township finally "got" recycling, but the list is short and it means that a lot of plastic still gets tossed (and that's even of the recyclable stuff). I can't even haul it anywhere myself- nowhere in the area will take #5 plastic (which seems to be the most common food container plastic).
no subject
Date: 2009-07-30 02:35 pm (UTC)'Round here, the closest place that takes any plastic but milk jugs is 45 miles away. The take 1 and 2, but only if it has a neck smaller than the body, so the open yogurt buckets, coffee cans, etc still aren't accepted.